<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AA8IA Amateur Radio &#187; Diamond X300NA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aa8ia.org/tag/diamond-x300na/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aa8ia.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Diamond X300NA Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/19/diamond-x300na-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/19/diamond-x300na-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond X300NA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aa8ia.org/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had the Diamond X300NA antenna in operation for a little over a week.   It&#8217;s fed with 50 feet of LMR-400.   So far the performance is better than I expected, but not as good as I had hoped &#8212; the latter being me just having higher expectations than I should have. The antenna is installed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had the Diamond X300NA antenna in operation for a little over a week.   It&#8217;s fed with 50 feet of LMR-400.   So far the performance is better than I expected, but not as good as I had hoped &#8212; the latter being me just having higher expectations than I should have.</p>
<p>The antenna is installed about 5 feet above the deck table on my back deck, mounted to a piece of PVC, which is stuck into the table and through the base where the umbrella used to go.   Obviously the antenna location/height is subpar.   It is within 5 feet of the eaves of the house to the East, and most of the antenna really isn&#8217;t even above the roofline to the east.</p>
<p>Given the current installation, it&#8217;s performing extremely well.   From a reception standpoint, it receives VHF 150-174 and aircraft better than the two scanner antennas I have here, both of which were mounted about 5 feet higher.    And since this antenna is tuned for 146 Mhz, that&#8217;s saying a lot.    On 440 Mhz I believe it is doing equally well on receive.   It doesn&#8217;t hear UHF from Pittsburgh area very well, but this is only because of the close proximity of the antenna to the house and its low height [not reaching above roofline].   If I could get the antenna up just another 10 feet [which is my goal here within the next few weeks], I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll work brilliantly over into PA.</p>
<p>From this location I can&#8217;t really compare transmit performance.   I didn&#8217;t have a 146 / 440 transmit antenna up at this location before.   I do know that access is full quieting into any of the local repeaters from Wheeling to Salem and out into Harrison Co.   I haven&#8217;t tried to access any Pennsylvania repeaters, but I&#8217;m sure the performance isn&#8217;t as good in that direction.</p>
<p>The antenna was extremely easy to put together and went up without a hitch.   I&#8217;ve got no complaints with it.   However, I will be sure to take down the antenna before winter and inspect it / waterproof  it.   I expect this antenna will last a long time and give me many years of good performance.   I really like this antenna better than the Cushcraft ARX2-B simply because it&#8217;s tougher.   I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s performance is likely comparable to a Ringo II though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/19/diamond-x300na-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The X300NA is On The Air</title>
		<link>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/07/the-x300na-is-on-the-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/07/the-x300na-is-on-the-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond X300NA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vertical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aa8ia.org/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received the Diamond X300NA today.   Took me about an hour to put it together on the kitchen table (trying to be quiet since baby was sleeping).   The instructions were very simple.   The antenna went together very easily and is actually simple to put together. I can&#8217;t really give a performance comparison for multiple reasons.   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received the Diamond X300NA today.   Took me about an hour to put  it together on the kitchen table (trying to be quiet since baby was  sleeping).   The instructions were very simple.   The antenna went  together very easily and is actually simple to put together.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t really give a performance comparison for multiple reasons.    First off, the antenna is only 4 feet off the top of the deck table.    Second, I didn&#8217;t have a previous transmit antenna at this location to  compare with.</p>
<p>On receive, it performs as well or better than my scanner antenna on  150-174 mhz and 450-475 Mhz.   800 Mhz performance, as anticipated, is  terrible.   I haven&#8217;t gotten a chance to compare 2m / 440 Mhz signals  since I haven&#8217;t listened to any 440 Mhz amateur repeaters in a long time  and I only monitor a few 2m frequencies.   I&#8217;ll try to test it out a  little more this evening.</p>
<p>I really need to get this antenna up over the roof of the house.   As  it is now, the majority of the antenna is below the roofline and close  to the house.   If I could get a 21-foot fence rail as a mast, mount it  on the ground at the side of the house with a proper support at the  eave, I&#8217;m sure it would do great.   This will be my only alternative at  present, and it&#8217;ll probably be at least a month before i get that  accomplished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/07/the-x300na-is-on-the-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awaiting the Arrival of the Diamond X300NA</title>
		<link>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/04/awaiting-the-arrival-of-the-diamond-x300na/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/04/awaiting-the-arrival-of-the-diamond-x300na/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 02:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[440 mhz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[base antenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond X300NA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual band]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aa8ia.org/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m awaiting the arrival of a Diamond X300NA 146/440 Mhz base antenna.  This is Diamond&#8217;s mid-range base antenna for 2m/440.  The NA designator means that the antenna is terminated with an N-Connector rather than an SO-239.   Looks to be of solid construction, and I&#8217;ve heard and read good reviews about the antenna. Given my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_10" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 105px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-10" href="http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/04/awaiting-the-arrival-of-the-diamond-x300na/dia-x300/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-10" title="dia-x300" src="http://www.aa8ia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dia-x300-95x300.jpg" alt="Diamond X300" width="95" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Diamond X300NA</p></div>
<p>I&#8217;m awaiting the arrival of a Diamond X300NA 146/440 Mhz base   antenna.  This is Diamond&#8217;s mid-range base antenna for 2m/440.  The NA  designator means that the antenna is terminated with an N-Connector  rather than an SO-239.   Looks  to be of solid construction, and I&#8217;ve  heard and read good reviews about  the antenna.</p>
<p>Given my restricted space and the fact that I&#8217;m not  prepared to put  up a tower, this will likely be mounted to a piece of PVC pipe sticking  out of the deck table [replacing the umbrella] until a permanent  location is decided upon.</p>
<p>I chose this antenna because of its solid  construction and the fact  that not only can it be used for 2m/440  activity but it can also be  used as a scanner antenna for 150-162 Mhz  and 450-470.   Sure, it is  not designed / tuned for those parts of  VHF/UHF but is close enough to  still outperform a typical omni scanner  antenna.    The reason for  choosing an antenna with an N-connector is because I run LMR-400 with  N-connectors for my coax system and N-connectors reportedly are better  to use at UHF and higher frequencies due to less loss.   I&#8217;ve also read  much material that debates this.    I chose an N-connector anyway.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll update once I receive the antenna and proceed with putting it up  in the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/04/awaiting-the-arrival-of-the-diamond-x300na/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

