<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AA8IA Amateur Radio &#187; base antenna</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aa8ia.org/tag/base-antenna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aa8ia.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Awaiting the Arrival of the Diamond X300NA</title>
		<link>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/04/awaiting-the-arrival-of-the-diamond-x300na/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/04/awaiting-the-arrival-of-the-diamond-x300na/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 02:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[440 mhz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[base antenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond X300NA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual band]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aa8ia.org/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m awaiting the arrival of a Diamond X300NA 146/440 Mhz base antenna.  This is Diamond&#8217;s mid-range base antenna for 2m/440.  The NA designator means that the antenna is terminated with an N-Connector rather than an SO-239.   Looks to be of solid construction, and I&#8217;ve heard and read good reviews about the antenna. Given my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_10" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 105px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-10" href="http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/04/awaiting-the-arrival-of-the-diamond-x300na/dia-x300/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-10" title="dia-x300" src="http://www.aa8ia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dia-x300-95x300.jpg" alt="Diamond X300" width="95" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Diamond X300NA</p></div>
<p>I&#8217;m awaiting the arrival of a Diamond X300NA 146/440 Mhz base   antenna.  This is Diamond&#8217;s mid-range base antenna for 2m/440.  The NA  designator means that the antenna is terminated with an N-Connector  rather than an SO-239.   Looks  to be of solid construction, and I&#8217;ve  heard and read good reviews about  the antenna.</p>
<p>Given my restricted space and the fact that I&#8217;m not  prepared to put  up a tower, this will likely be mounted to a piece of PVC pipe sticking  out of the deck table [replacing the umbrella] until a permanent  location is decided upon.</p>
<p>I chose this antenna because of its solid  construction and the fact  that not only can it be used for 2m/440  activity but it can also be  used as a scanner antenna for 150-162 Mhz  and 450-470.   Sure, it is  not designed / tuned for those parts of  VHF/UHF but is close enough to  still outperform a typical omni scanner  antenna.    The reason for  choosing an antenna with an N-connector is because I run LMR-400 with  N-connectors for my coax system and N-connectors reportedly are better  to use at UHF and higher frequencies due to less loss.   I&#8217;ve also read  much material that debates this.    I chose an N-connector anyway.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll update once I receive the antenna and proceed with putting it up  in the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aa8ia.org/2010/04/04/awaiting-the-arrival-of-the-diamond-x300na/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

